The Information Gap
The primary reason designers continue to produce designs that GCs cannot build without significant changes is a serious information disconnect that exists even in D&C contracts. Information about the pricing and availability of materials, for instance, is almost never available to designers, so they deliver just the design intent, which all but ensures changes and rework will be needed to build the structure.
Every stakeholder needs access to current information about materials and pricing throughout the design and build process, and that includes pre-construction. Would Toyota design a new car without a thorough understanding of the availability and pricing of components or the manufacturing process that would be used to produce the vehicles? But that’s exactly how it works today in construction. Designers deliver instructions via PDF drawings, (ironically developed in a BIM platform) on how to build a structure without any idea of how it will be actually built or whether the components are actually available at a price that won’t throw the entire project out of budget.
Designers are doing the best they can with what they have – they want their designs to be realized efficiently, on time and within budget – but they’re working in the dark. Unless they can access sufficient, accurate information early in the process, they can’t overcome construction and supply chain challenges that they don’t know exist.
This information gap makes pre-construction one of the most fruitful places to streamline and create more efficiencies across the entire design and construction process. After all, in D&C and other contracts, all stakeholders have to devote significant resources, money and time to managing the pre-construction process, and the output from pre-construction has far reaching effects all the way downstream.
All projects, not just D&C contracts, should adopt a product approach to construction that takes full advantage of modern AI and data technologies to identify, gather and share accurate information so that GCs will receive a design that requires far fewer changes than is ordinarily the case. This is “process as a product” in a nutshell, as it leverages automation to take design intent in both two and three-dimension geometries and automatically combine it with relevant cost, design, and data that it pulls from a variety of sources. With this information in hand, issues such as components unavailability or sudden pricing changes can be addressed early, when it’s easy and inexpensive to do so.
Data Delivery and AI – Making Efficient D&C a Reality
AI can do more than just find and deliver relevant information. It can also enhance computational design scripts with AI, taking the design intent geometry, analyzing both the situation and contextual data and suggesting multiple optimized design solutions that fall within the established parameters for the building. It’s a powerful capability, but it’s not sufficient to solve the problem of the information gap.
All that data that AI finds and grabs won’t be of much use unless it gets to the people who can change the design in time to have an impact. So, in concert with AI, organizations need to have strong computational tools in place that make that data available so designers can readily apply their expertise and experience where it matters. Multi-criteria data analyses should provide critical data such as:
- Materials pricing and availability
- The logistics of transporting and storing materials
- Resource and labor requirements for realizing design elements on-site
Enabling true Design for Constructability requires a combination of AI/machine learning with computational tools that provide current, accurate data in a useful format so designers can immediately put it to good use. With these technologies properly deployed, the need for a “finding fault” business model evaporates, because GC will receive designs that are ready to be built without requiring change after change to make it something that can actually be constructed.
Source: Dixie Contractor